Vampire movies in general
scare me to death. I tend to avoid them like the plague as my personal
idea of a good time at the movies does not involve total cardiac arrest.
There are times when I’ll make exceptions. I went to see Shadow of a
Vampire because John Malkovich is amazing. I went to see Bram Stoker’s
Dracula because I am a glutton for punishment. And I went to see Interview
with the Vampire and Queen of the Damned because, though they
may not be high brow I love Anne Rice books.
This will be the only
time (I can only imagine) that I will ever commit these words to a column
with my name attached to them in any capacity.
*ahem*
Tom
Cruise had it right.
(Sound of everyone I know
collapsing of shock at me complimenting Tom Cruise.)
In Interview with the
Vampire Cruise’s Lestat was everything I imagined that character would
be; charismatic, magnetic, and incredibly powerful. Cruise spent that movie
zooming past everyone’s expectations, (including Rice’s herself) and silencing
most critics of his work in the process. In Queen of the Damned
Stuart Townsend (Wonderland, Shooting Fish) steps into the
role, but instead of keeping in line with Rice’s character, or even summoning
some of the class of Cruise’s portrayal, he turns him into a brat.
Queen
of the Damned is the continuing story of Lestat, Rice’s prodigal vampire.
In this chapter he is flying in the face of tradition by emerging from
the solitary life he is expected to lead to head a New Orleans rock band.
(Think U2 meets Marilyn Manson) Lestat’s music awakens Akasha, an ancient
and very powerful vampire who once ruled through massacre and aspires to
do so again.
Townsend as Lestat has
none of Cruise’s sexy, calculating animal. Instead he makes the absurd
choice to portray him as a power hungry adolescent taking a measure of
taste away from the movie. There’s absolutely nothing memorable about Townsend’s
performance here save for it’s blandness.
The late Aaliyah (Romeo
Must Die) stars as Akasha, the ancient “mother of all vampires.” Watching
her performance which consists mainly of her scrutinizing different people
until they burst into flame, I do get the impression that she would have
done quite well if the script hadn’t been so atrocious. She does
inject some magnetism into her role. (Though sadly it’s not nearly enough
to make up for its’ total lack on Townsend’s part.) However, since she
is given control over what seems to be the only special effect in the film,
and a fairly cheesy one at that, it detracts from her performance.
The problems here are
many. Queen of the Damned possesses none of the originality
of Interview With the Vampire In Interview death scenes were
handled with taste and delicacy. In Queen of the Damned every death
scene is the same. (Scene 1: Vampire is hit by sunlight, bursts into flame
and dissolves into ash. Scene 2: Akasha squints at vampire, vampire bursts
into flame and dissolves into ash. Scene 3: Akasha points at vampire, vampire......)
It smacks of the idea that absolutely no thought was poured into the smaller
details of this movie at all. It is apparent from what everyone is
wearing that the costume designer for this film has the fashion sense of
cement. Queen of the Damned possesses none of the spark and spice
of Rice’s first cinematic adaptation, and none of the talent involved are
up to the level of their predecessors. Queen of the Damned, if we
dig down deep into our bag of euphemism's; sucks.
Jen
Johnston