Kinji Fukasaku’s controversial
film Battle Royale (2000) has so far remained - to my knowledge
- untouched by theatrical distributors in the United States, and this follow
up, set a few years after the first film, is unlikely to surface in the
US anytime soon. Like the first movie, the sequel begins with a class
of unruly school kids rounded up to be players in a violent sport named
‘Battle Royale’. As in the previous film, they are armed with weapons
and fitted with explosive collars to ensure their participation.
This time however, the game, like the film, is billed as ‘Battle Royale
II’ and the rules have changed. Instead of the kids killing off each
other until one ‘winner’ is left alive, this time the class are ordered
to storm an island housing the youth terrorist group ‘Wild Seven’, led
by Nanahara (Tatsuya Fujiwara) one of the survivors from the first film.
The class land on the island, and in a scene reminiscent of Saving Private
Ryan (1998), many of them are massacred on the beach by machine gun
fire. After losing more classmates to booby traps and enemy fire,
the remaining kids are eventually captured by Nanahara. However,
instead of killing them, he spares their lives and deactivates their collars.
Nanahara recounts his experiences since the first film and lectures the
kids on the injustices that face the young and other oppressed groups around
the world. With the help of his loyal followers and the survivors
from the class, Nanahara vows to make a stand against the adult oppressors.
The original Battle
Royale was an intense, unnerving and unforgettable experience, and
any sequel would have to really pull out the stops to try to top it.
Although this film contains nods to the original, the scope has been broadened
considerably and the focus is no longer on just one class of kids.
The result is that the film - whether due to the absence of Kinji Fukasaku
(who passed away during its production) or simply because of the law of
diminishing returns - is not as unsettling or provocative as its predecessor,
despite its criticism of US foreign policy and topical references to terrorism.
The new ‘Battle Royale’ class are not as memorable as the kids from the
original either, despite the fact that a couple of them have very personal
reasons for taking part in this new ‘game’. Like ‘Beat’ Takeshi in
the first film, it’s an adult character that almost steals the show, with
Riki Takeuchi’s pill-popping, wild-eyed teacher a delirious delight.
As expected, the battle scenes are bloody and realistic, an effect heightened
- like the first film - by thunderous sound design, but strangely, the
shock factor has diminished, despite the fact that we’re watching helpless
school kids forced into a deadly situation by fascistic adults. There
are some interesting references to recent world events, but they feel as
if they've been forced into the film, rather than growing naturally out
of the ‘Battle Royale’ premise established in the original film.
Still, you have to admire an action film (which also features scenes of
broad comedy amidst the carnage!) that attempts to confront contemporary
politics without resorting to simplistic flag-waving or settling for easy
answers to complex and troubling questions. As a side note, fans
of Japanese movies will be delighted to see cameo appearances from a couple
of legendary film stars.