Is it a one-off? Is it
a sequel? Is it a re-imagining? Or is it another attempt to get a foothold
of a franchise. Either way the superhero who wears his heart on his
sleeve and his underwear on the outside of his trousers is back on Earth
and heading for Metropolis.
Many people have been
asking whether we need another Superman movie in this current cultural
and political climate. But in terms of entertainment value there
is always the need for him, and if there are any sceptics in the audience
when I saw it the criticism starts to wash away once the opening bars of
John Williams' famous score begin.
Singer along with his
screenwriters Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris, take the film as five years
after the end of Superman II. Superman has left Earth to attempt
to find fragments of his lost home planet of Krypton. He returns
to Earth and as Clark Kent goes back to the Daily Planet to find Lois Lane
now has a child, is engaged to Richard White (the editor's nephew) and
she is to win a Pulitzer Prize for an article entitled, 'Why the world
doesn't need Superman?' The film loses some of the screwball romance
of the original Richard Donner film of 1978 and instead becomes a love
triangle with a child.
An early criticism I have
is that it fails to focus on the Clark Kent character and more on Kal-El.
The filmmakers have missed an opportunity to comment on the immigrant living
in America - Superman is an illegal alien remember. And it paints
Clark as nothing more than the real costume that Kal-El wears while the
cape is his home. From what I remember the bumbling Clark - played
by the late Christopher Reeve - and the laughs gained from it was one of
the enjoying parts of Donner's film.
Now this may sound like
I am having a criticism of Brandon Routh, the unknown actor who has taken
up the baton to play the Man of Steel. But whether he was good or
not Routh was on to a hiding to nothing. The legacy left by Reeve
and the work done by Tom Welling on the television series 'Smallville',
means that too many people and too many generations have a recognition
and expectation of what Superman should be like. (A bit like the
problem Christian Bale encountered last year as Batman; people still think
of Batman as Adam West or Michael Keaton.) But it must be said that
due to his physical presence and the amount of set-pieces in the film Routh
does achieve his one aim, we do believe he can fly.
The film though I think
has got caught in the current problem facing would-be franchises; the need
to show that the film can be entertaining in terms of set pieces yet can
also have legs in terms of caring about the characters. There are in this
instance too many set pieces. These lengthy scenes allow Routh the luxury
to not worry so much about acting or talking dialogue but look good in
front of a bluescreen. You might think that the film gets bogged
down in poor characterisation and at times it does but why should it when
we know these characters too well. This is a shame as the few scenes
that Routh has with Kate Bosworth (as Lois Lane) are filled with an intensity
and chemistry that sometimes is missing. Bosworth (a much criticised
casting) is wonderful as Lois, feisty, cagey but intelligent. The
other down side of these set pieces is that you get the feeling that Kevin
Spacey is underused in the film even though his presence cannot be missed
and his double act with Parker Posey (might get more exposure now) provides
the comic relief in the film.
This may sound like a
negative review but it is only negative in the sense that the filmmakers
have missed a few tricks and concentrated on the spectacle rather than
the subtext. This is a shame from Singer considering it was the excellent
work on the two X-Men films, juggling style and substance that gave him
this job.
All the actors do the
roles know disservice refusing to give into winking at the camera and believing
in the character, while all the same being overcome by what else is going
on in the frame. The door has naturally been left open for a sequel
hopefully providing a far better resolution than we get here. And
after two and a half hours of frequent action the ending is somewhat sudden
but signposted at the same time.
A chance missed or were
they just watching men in the sky.
***
I attended a preview screening
of SUPERMAN RETURNS at the bfi IMAX cinema in Waterloo to witness the film
in its 3D form. This incorporated watching the film in 2D but with
four scenes amounting to 20 minutes in 3D footage. Viewers watch
the film and then when given a signal on the bottom of the screen put on
the 3D glasses to enjoy the effect. The scenes that have the effect
are the same as in the film, but it is quite an amazing thing to watch
in the flesh. The IMAX cinema is the only screen in the country that
will have these scenes in 3D and Superman Returns in 3D will open on 14
July.
Ticket prices are Adults
£12.00, Children (up to and including 14) £8.00, Concessions
£9.75. The reduced rate for groups of 10 people or more is
Adults £11.00, Children £7.00 and concessions £8.75.
For information and showtimes
call 0870 787 2525 or visit:
www.bfi.org.uk/imax
Jamie
Garwood