Home
Features
Reviews
Book
Reviews
News
About Us
Email
|
The beginning of
the 1990s saw a rash of new A-Z movie guides to join the many similar titles
already available. This piece takes a critical look at the main ones. It
also, slightly light-heartedly, gives a one to four star rating for each
one. If it seems harsh to judge years of work in a few lines, remember
that's what these books attempt to do.
Elliot's Guide
to Films on Video*, second edition, by John Elliot. London, Boxtree
Books, 1991, £14.99. 10,500 entries. Title, star rating, certificate,
director, country, year, running time, video distributor.
Useful because it lists films' (theoretical)
video availability and their distributors, this guide is quite conventional
in its critical judgements, from The Battleship Potemkin (brilliant
use of montage) through Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (the
first in a batch of fresh, raw working class dramas) to The Curse of
Frankenstein (gave rise to an interminable succession of lurid and
increasingly cliched horror films).
Halliwell's Film
Guide**, eighth edition, ed. John Walker. London, Harper and Collins,
1991, £30. 17,000 entries. Title, star rating, country, year, colour/widescreen
processes, production company/distributor, producer, writer, director,
cinematographer, music, cast, Oscar/BAFTA nominations and awards.
Anyone who uses Halliwell's books is
familiar with his quirky style and individual premises. His tastes are
mainstream but also irritatingly middlebrow, and movies made since 1960
get short shrift. The last film to get a four star rating is Bonnie
and Clyde, when surely there should be an equally important film among,
say, The Godfather Part II, Taxi Driver, Star Wars,
E.T. and Hannah and Her Sisters. Nonetheless, this is the
most comprehensive guide to film credits, even if they're not always accurate.
After Halliwell's death, John Walker has updated the book dutifully, but
without Halliwell's lively, if jaundiced, prose style.
Leonard Maltin's
Movies and Video Guide**** (formerly TV Movies), 1992 edition, ed.
Leonard Maltin. London, Penguin, 1991, £7.99. 19,500 entries. Title,
year, country, colour or black and white, running time, director, cast,
US video availability.
The best of the batch: Maltin and his
staff of reviewers deal with more films than any of the other guides, get
their facts (and, most difficultly, running times) scrupulously right and
are concise and perceptive in their judgements. Obscure exploitation flicks
generally get treated equitably alongside more prestigious output - and
British films get surprisingly comprehensive coverage. A book for almost
all tastes which avoids glibness.
Movies On TV*,
1992 edition, ed. Steven H. Scheuer. Bantom Books, 1991, £7.99. 9,000
entries. Title, year, country, star rating, cast, director, running time,
US video availability.
The longest standing of these books
(originally published 1958) has been somewhat superseded by Leonard Maltin's,
which covers the same ground more reliably. It's useful but the reviews
don't have the sparkle of Maltin's team's - and the criticism is sometimes
quirky. Profoundly impressed as I was by Star Wars and Raiders
of the Lost Ark, it's unsettling to read reviews of both that begin
Zowie!
The Time Out Film
Guide***, second edition, ed. Tom Milne. London, Penguin Books,
1991, £9.99. 9,500 entries. Title, director, year, country, cast,
running time, video availability.
This one claims to be different, rightly
arguing that many film guides' attitudes are too often a compound of middlebrow
and fan magazine. The introduction to this collection of Time Out
reviews since 1968 says B movies like Edgar Ulmer's Ruthless, or
Jack Arnold's The Incredible Shrinking Man, poverty rows equivalents
to Orson Welles' Citizen Kane and Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space
Odyssey, can hold their heads high.' But the book is not always as
fresh as it claims. Like Halliwell, for example, it lumps the Carry
On series together in one entry: Slapdash in conception and execution,
the films nominally satirised British customs and institutions or other
movie genres; and Gilbert Adair accuses Steven Spielberg of making films
for infants and critical regressives. But the relatively small selection
of films allows the reviews to be longer, and many are thought-provoking.
David Pirie's pieces on horror movies are especially worth reading.
Variety Movie
Guide**, first edition, ed. Derek Elley. London, Hamlyn, 1991, £12.99.
5,000 entries. Title, year, running time, country, colour or black and
white, video availability, director, producer, screenwriter, cinematographer,
editor, music, art director, cast, production company, Oscar nominations
and awards for best picture.
Like the Time Out guide, this
takes a smaller selection of films and devotes more space to each. The
reviews are culled from Hollywood's leading trade paper and are invaluable
in giving a contemporary perspective on each film. The only drawback is
in the way the pieces have inevitably been shortened for the book: it reads
as though many of the more interesting comments have been pruned in favour
of somewhat clumsy synopses. Variety's famously hard-hitting prose
seems to have been softened.
|