Independent cinema has
a crucial role to play in the building and sustaining of a British Film
Industry - predominantly because an organised film industry (such as could
ever hope to rival Hollywood, or Bollywood) does not exist here in the
UK. So, when a group of inspired young Brits take it on themselves to produce
(and then get national distribution for) homegrown talent, one is obliged
to support their endeavours. And one seems more willing to gloss-over minor
faults and focus decisively on any positives. You lean forward eagerly
in your seat and urge the film on to greatness. And I approached Emotional
Backgammon with these hopes and preparedness. But, ultimately, a film
might not measure up, whether it's a low budget, independent production
or a Hollywood megabuck blockbuster. Unfortunately, Emotional Backgammon
does not measure-up to our hopes or expectations.
It’s not that there isn’t
some admirable work here for there is. A largely black cast, which portrays
unabashed ethnicity, is fresh and welcome. The idea of the movie is almost
clever with a few good twists along the way. The plot (such as it is) is
a modern, ethnic take on the age-old shenanigans of love and gender wars.
Indeed, here, the ‘game of love’ is stressed as a strategic interplay between
men and women: hence the title. Unfortunately, despite a clever concept
of likening relationship manipulation to a mentally challenging game of
backgammon, it is overstated and where subtlety would inspire, overkill
drowns out any notion of ingenuity.
The story is somewhat
lightweight and yet convoluted. Our narrator for the film, Steve Smith,
attempts to use strange logic and gamesmanship to ensure that his mate,
John, wins back his girlfriend, Mary. Unknown to him, however, Mary’s friend,
Jane, manipulates from the girl sidelines. With numerous references to
Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, the tale is told of how men
and women play at the artifice of love but with none of the Bard’s subtlety
or insight. (Watch out for the ‘oh-so-clever’ pun on The Taming of the
Shrewd. The first use just about raised a smile, why oh why did they
see fit to keep repeating it?)
The editorial techniques
of intercutting the influence-wielding friends with the playing of a game
of backgammon works well visually. It is completely overused but the stylised
shots offer some stimulation amongst some otherwise unremarkable photography.
(Did I really see two completely blurred, out of focus scenes in this film?
Can I in any way be generous and call it ‘art’?) The plot spirals out of
control and delivers a jilted groom, animalistic lust, a homosexual shocker,
unplanned pregnancy and a murder - and that’s not even the end!
This film suffers in that
it’s a dialogue driven piece whose dialogue just isn’t up to it. There
are a couple of witty one-liners and one or two pithy exchanges but it’s
not enough to lift the movie above a mediocre, relatively unfunny and unsophisticated
look at the quagmire of male / female relationships. The screenplay (by
Leon Herbert and Matthew Hope) doesn’t deliver. Neither does Herbert’s
direction or acting. Only Wil Johnson stands out in the role of leading
man in a cast who turn in lacklustre performances. One saving grace is
the good soundtrack but it alone cannot rescue this film.
Emotional Backgammon
had an intriguing concept and the potential to be a novel and inspiring
movie. On paper, it had all the hallmarks of an Independent classic but
it isn’t and all the best will in the world cannot change that.
Angela
Swift