Undoubtedly the horror of 2014 has been the phenomenal
Babbadook with a story that even sounds scary at
logline level: a boy and mother terrorised by a
creature that comes out of the pop-up book of the same
name. The film was not a massive budgeted feature, but
a small production funded in part by a crowd funding
initiative on Kickstarter. The idea, the narrative,
the writing and the performances are spot on and the
film is garnering a reputation for being the scariest
film since The Exorcist. In truth, the success of The
Babbadook is due to it having a plot line and dramatic
tension which knits in firmly to the psychologies and
circumstances of the characters: Spielberg was always
excellent at this: the broken home is conduit for
external forces that see and feel the missing harmony
of a nuclear unit.
This latest horror is as much commentary on the plight
of the single mother as it is horror feature. In the
exceptional Candyman, the urban legend represents the
tensions in the rich and poor within the life of a
block of flats in an inner city. The idea of a
circumstance and tension feeding a hungry demon
summoned by accident is still something with
considerable mileage. Insidious covered the same
territory but with Astral Flying as travelling means
for the uneasy spirit: what was very disturbing here
was the idea of the victim being preyed upon by a
parasite for years having hung about the poor adult
from childhood.
The Found Footage horror sub-genre was pre-empted by
the astounding success of The Blair Witch Project, a
film with a great and favourable budget to receipts
ratio. It was however, flawed with an irritating style
(most of the film is spent looking at twigs either at
ground or eye level) with a very annoying and
unsympathetic central character. It was a runaway
success in the underground student bars and clubs as
it pertained to show how easy it was to make an
amateurish feature into a box office success. It cost
relatively little to make ($10k) but took millions.
Prior to this, Mad Max held the budget to takings
title and both films are undoubted cult favourites.
Paranormal Activity has been a very successful
franchise with the initial feature frightening the
bejesus out of Spielberg claiming that the film itself
was spooked. It was nearer in story to Insidious
(a film that came after) than Blair Witch, the focus
being possession and haunting rather than earthy
witches and goblins folklore. After the release
of Troll Hunter which was favoured by critics and
audience alike, it was clear that there was room for
other legends in horror to be given the once over in
this sub-genre. Troll Hunter could and should have
been better with an emphasis on the morality tale
feature in the Grimm stories featuring the same
creatures: Trolls were usually dwellers under bridges
and the crossing of them successfully were a test of
bravery or virtuousness. They were Gatekeepers between
the worlds of feast/famine, good/evil. As it was
we got a riot of a film with larger than life
creatures being tracked and hunted by a Nordic man
with a mission. Troll as poor man's test is a
far better story option: those tested could be eaten
if not deserving. This as metaphor for modern life has
been sadly undernourished.
As a checklist as to what has yet to be covered by
found footage find the below useful:
Elves & Pixies
The Loch Ness Monster
Atlantis
Nirvana
Unicorns
Fairies
Wizards/Warlocks
The Bogeyman
The Tooth Fairy Sea
Ghosts/Wreckage Footage
Lagoon Creatures
Voodoo
The list is not withstanding any mythology form from
other nations. The interpretations thus far have been
largely Western. There have been Extra Terrestrial
takes but presented from the Western perspective. In
all tales there has been the missing link of the
finder in the story and this gap needs to be filled by
something other than 'On Screen' narrative as to where
the footage is/was found.
Willow Creek
Director: Bobcat Goldthwait 78mins
Willow Creek is set in two parts, or rather two and a
half. We are introduced to the main leads; a man and
his gal are going to the place where the Legend of
Bigfoot famous 8mm was shot, the 1967 Patterson grainy
account of a Yeti in the woods. There is the journey,
the bit in the woods and the finale. This is as much a
travelogue as it is a found footage gem: the aspects
of Americana that are portrayed in the journey to this
place in the middle of no-where are right on the
money. There is never a feeling of the fakery in
this, unlike the other found footage film of the year
The Borderlands with dodgy acting and location shots
throughout. All of this is compelling and convincing.
The couple Jim and Kelly are very convincing as the
believing/non-believing duo (played by Bryce Johnson
and Alexie Gilmore) and most of the set up relates to
this relationship. They discover together the small,
sad businesses that have emerged from the tourist
aspects of Bigfoot, the restaurants, the bookshop, the
petrol stations. The humour is shared in the
observations and the audience feels in Act One as
fellow travellers in a determined quest. We share the
couple's take on the small mindedness of the business
owners and there is a very nasty encounter with a guy
evidently a bit cheesed off with tourist interceptors.
The acting is just spot on and professional
throughout.
Of course this helps with not just the suspension of
disbelief needed for horror especially but helps
engage with the characters. When Jim has something
special to ask of his gal in the tent - we are keen to
know the answer. Act Two is the weak bit. There is too
long spent by these two in a tent with the camera
focused on them slowly freaking out. The drama could
have been better delivered with intermittent action.
This would not have taken much in terms of Special
Effects to deliver: the idea of a pair, with a woman
yet to fully commit to her man, having the
relationship tested (and him in the process), in a
tent with just this between them and a big fuck off
monster outside is a good one with legs: big hairy
legs. It could have well delved into B movie territory
with some monster shadows and clawing. As is,
the sound effects are like two coconuts being clanged
together. Had the monster come to claim Kelly, with
Jim going in pursuit after hearing her scream, to find
her ravished would have been a bit of a clincher and a
great story in the tradition of how these creatures
have always been portrayed: primitive and lusty.
The time in the tent doesn't keep with the stakes that
are set in the time we have had with these two in the
lead up to them being there. What is good about the
found footage genre is that it doesn't limit the
intense action to the night time. By the time a full
night has gone by, the pair is intent on going home.
The usual 'going round in circles' plot twist is by
now, lame, expected and doesn't add to the drama of
the lost being so. What would have been a great twist
would have been the nasty guy turning up as a kind of
'Yeti familiar' who feeds the creature tourists that
don't know better and go away when told. This would
have been a commentary on the ever problematic tension
between the need for tourism and the hatred of it.
The found footage sub-genre has still a lot going for
it and will be used as a method of choice due to its
budget versus box office potential that is proven and
measurable. The need though is for the writers and
directors to know their low-budget b movie film
history and literacy to delve and dip into. This
example has the benefit of being credible in its
presentation of a particular necessary evil (tourism)
and eternal problems of disruption, nosiness and
curiosity being perpetrated on locales. It has the
prospect of being a morality tale as regards the
lessons in leaving the unexplored just that:
civilisation doesn't need to occur everywhere. And the
environmental costs are proving detrimental. It is
also very curious as to why found footage is limited
to the horror genre or is consistently used in the
context of a classical horror monster or mythology.
Found footage can and should be delivered with a lot
more imagination within a wider dramatic context. It
will be interesting to see what 2015 brings in terms
of delivering this product in different and
imaginative ways.
Gail Spencer
All films quoted here are available on DVD on Amazon