This HBO miniseries by Scorsese, which adds to a
musical portfolio including a Rolling Stones concert
(Shine a Light) and a Bob Dylan biography ( No
Direction Home) focuses on the other Beatle who isn't
around any more, and perhaps the must mysterious and
different of the four as well as ostensibly the one
who most deeply sought to explore life's meaning.
George is the one who was on a spiritual quest, and it
led him to playing the sitar and meditation,
explorations that changed the band's style and its
members' behavior. Scorsese makes very good
documentaries of the archival, illustrative, rather
than investigative kind. It's an interesting paradox
that a man in the middle of a media circus like George
Harrison of the Beatles would go on serious search of
inner peace and deeper understanding. Harrison
explains this in a vintage TV interview. He says they
found great material success early in life and so
found out early that it was not the answer.
The Beatles must be among the most documented
entertainers in history. There's no shortage of
material, including plenty of interview footage with
Harrison and people interviewed recently about him,
like Ringo Starr, Paul McCartney, Eric Clapton, later
Eric Idle. But is this the way to get to the core of a
life? Is this the way to get an insight into some of
the most popular of all pop music? Scorsese provides a
glossy survey, with great sound when the songs come
(though they're not always allowed to run long enough)
, and with plenty of sighs and gasps and chuckles
along the way. And we have a good organizer: David
Tedeschi, who edited Scorsese's superb Dylan bio, also
did the editing here.
The film begins with Harrison's youth, then the
Beatles' early days from Hamburg to the meteoric media
rise, much of it narrated via letters home from
George, writing to his mother. As Peter DeBurge of
Variety points out, Scorsese assumes an audience
already "up to speed" on the Beatles story and
therefore does not bother to introduce some of the
speakers till several hours in. Among the "many small
details omitted along the way" is Stuart Sutcliffe,
the band's lost bassist, not even fully named, and
nothing much is explained about the Beatles' manager
Brian Epstein till the moment of his death in his
early thirties (also unexplained). Black and white
still photographs are often beautiful, finely
rendered, and introduced at just the right moment, but
not provided with much context. Though this
documentary (which runs to over three and a half
hours) provides a wealth of material, it seems more
celebratory than informative.
The key trajectory, of course, is Harrison's shift to
eastern music and thought. There's more than one hint
that LSD opened portals of perception that Harrison
knew needed to be kept open by natural means. It's
clear that Harrison became not just a pupil but a
friend of Ravi Shankar. This orientalism led the
Beatles to go from being the adorable pop band for
screaming teenage girls through the Sergeant Pepper
Lonely Hearts Club Band to a Sixties and Seventies
cultural icon worthy of endless interpretation and
academic scrutiny.
Somehow George Harrison went from coolness and inner
peace to far too many drugs and a burnt-out voice. The
film doesn't offer anybody who can explain this. Could
it be something it does describe, the fact that Eric
Clapton went off with George Harrison's wife? The hard
parts come in Part II. This is when 1970 comes, the
Sixties ends, the group breaks up (nothing about the
rift caused by Yoko Ono). Harrison makes his solo
albums, gives the Bangladesh concert, gets involved
with Monty Python and funds their Life of Brian,
starts his own film production company, and moves to
the giant Victorian mansion, Friar Park: the film
turns personal, and ends with Harrison's stabbing and
subsequent death from cancer.
After Lennon's assassination the film infomrs us how
Harrison spent a lot of time preparing for death and
in doing so managed to be in a state of relative
wisdom and peace and positivity when the end came.
DeBurge argues that of all the Beatles Harrison is the
most worthy of a detailed portrait because of the way
he changed and sought answers to the deepest questions
about life's meaning. But that is debatable. McCartney
is the musical genius of the group. I personally would
like to learn more about the music and how they made
it, topics that seem secondary here, except for some
good interviews with producers, including Phil
Spector. And Lennon is still arguably the most
charismatic and intellectually complex personality
and, of course, he has been documented well already
for that reason. I don't think this ranks with
Scorsese's Bob Dylan biography; but it's not like
you'd want to miss this if you are a Sixties or pop
music fan. There is a handsome coffee table book to
accompany it.
Screened for this review at the New York Film Festival
at Lincoln Center, in which it is a main slate
selection. Also opens in the UK on October 4, 2011.
The two-part film, 208 min total. US TV premiere
October 5, 2011. Also showing on some big screens
after October 7 in the US and UK.